All publications of James Wahrburg . Miami , United States of Ame

https://youtu.be/N1H9zZpkbbc

Noemi Moreno is a wonderful person and Spanish singer of 35 years who lives in Malaga, Noemi tells us when she was 3 and a half years old her father gave her a microphone and since then she started her devotion to music and learned to play the piano. Over the years, after a break, she resumed her musical life two years ago. Noemi is a great person with ethical and moral values that make that sweet and soft voice transmit to the bottom of our hearts and make our hair stand on end with a humility that few artists have today. A few months ago, her aunt Antonia Moreno, wife of Pepe Maldonado, the president of the national association for gypsy children, made a special request of him and she composed this song entitled LUCHA, dedicated to the families of the children in care. Noemi cried and empathized with her listeners, entering their hearts with the creation of this song and it is not for less with the situation that the children are having for the public institutions and the suffering that it brings to the children and the families, but this song transmits a lot of energy and hope of fight, giving encouragement to all the families that in one way or another have to fight against the institutions of the Spanish state that kidnap their children.

Lucha is an original song created by Noemi Moreno Barceló, and collaboration of Yamandu Padron Madrid who made the musical arrangements.

Thank you Noemi Moreno and Yamandu Padron for this great song, we wish with all our hearts, that this is the beginning of a great chain and that God gives us the opportunity to listen to you live from Miami, that this sweet voice, that transmits peace, tranquility and positive energy sounds around the world. God bless you.

FIGHT

What sounds in this house

the loss of a mother

that he's begging his kid to see,

Giant the condemnation for having been a mom

with lies broke his identity,

the door is closed the papers are accompanied

and hugging your child can't give.

Who took away your right to fight

families and siblings, go forward together

AND FIGHT, DON'T GET TIRED OF FIGHTING FOR THAT LOVE THAT NEEDS YOU SO MUCH

FIGHT, THAT YOUR CHILDREN DESERVE THE COURAGE, OF THEIR MOTHER AS LONG AS SHE LIVES,

AND FIGHT, DON'T GET TIRED OF FIGHTING FOR THAT LOVE THAT NEEDS YOU SO MUCH

FIGHT, THAT YOUR CHILDREN DESERVE THE COURAGE, OF THEIR MOTHER AS LONG AS SHE LIVES,

He fights for the family,

fight for the family

(I love you mommy)

AND FIGHT, DON'T GET TIRED OF FIGHTING FOR THAT LOVE THAT NEEDS YOU SO MUCH

FIGHT, THAT YOUR CHILDREN DESERVE THE COURAGE, OF THEIR MOTHER AS LONG AS SHE LIVES,

AND FIGHT, DON'T GET TIRED OF FIGHTING FOR THAT LOVE THAT NEEDS YOU SO MUCH

FIGHT, THAT YOUR CHILDREN DESERVE THE COURAGE, OF THEIR MOTHER AS LONG AS SHE LIVES

WE CONDEMN THE ANTI-GYPSY KILLING ON STRIKE

A 35-year-old gypsy father of four is murdered in the back when he was with his 7-year-old son who was also shot without injury.

From Camelamos, the first thing we want is to send our condolences to the family and friends of the murdered Roma in Rociana del Condado (Huelva)

This tragic event should have been accompanied by this headline but once more, we see in many media how the killer is laundered, how he is makes a personal profile to humanize him, feel sorry for him, and even we know that he was "a normal person", "that the farm was a hobby", that "he was a poor retired" and that "he was so quiet at home" Anti-gypsyism makes a bucket of beans worth more than the life of a father of family with 4 children, we saw how since the Coronavirus crisis the cases of anti-gypsyism are on the rise in social networks and media and yesterday this

anti-Gypsyism allowed and even encouraged reached its peak with this murder. For a bucket of beans.

This does not come out of the blue, there are many years in which the Public Administrations have allowed by action or omission that the Romany community is considered sub-human and therefore our life is worth less than that of animals.

A change is needed in the penal code that allows the condemnation of anti-Gypsyism as many other specific violations are already reflected, that the Prosecutor's Office acts ex officio in the face of comments in the media and that it does not come cheap to excuse the death because it was a "conflictive" person and the murderer was a "good man".

From the gypsy grassroots movements we are not going to be quiet and we are going to to fight so that this murder does not go unpunished.

We want to send a hug to an entire family who has seen him removed from a a loved one in a despicable way and that they know that we are here to accompany them in the fight for justice.

Opre Roma

THIS COUPLE, RESIDENT IN MADRID, ASSURES THAT "WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO GET CLOSE TO OUR CHILDREN FOR THREE YEARS BECAUSE THEY WON'T LET US IN THE CHILDREN'S CENTRE".

The tragic story of parents Marina and Adrian: "They took our children for no reason and we don't see them"

The story of these parents of two girls and a boy shows how, since 2013, they live in a completely strange situation. The children were taken to a shelter in Madrid and later to another centre in Arganda, where they last saw their children. The mother, Marina, explains that her children sometimes have "wounds".

They are Marina García Ferrero and Adrián Villarreal, parents who have not seen their children "for three years", as the mother tells how it begins in 2013 when one of her daughters, who was 4 years old at the time, was allegedly bullied at school. "Our daughter is starting to suffer from bullying. We found out about it because another father apologized to my husband because his son had kicked my daughter," explains this mother.

"We took her to a psychologist because she didn't want to go to school. The psychologist determines that she has to follow some guidelines to go back to school. When she returns, the only solution the school offers is to sit her down at recess and watch the children play," says Marina, who adds that "the psychologist talked to the principal and told her that this was counterproductive.

The psychologist talked to this mother about changing schools and in June 2013 the girl was already going to be changed. From that moment on, this long journey begins for Marina and Adrián who are trying to find all the legal ways to get their children back.

Then a social worker contacts Marina because of the problems her daughter was having at school. "Marina, what happened? The principal tells me you're complaining about bullying. What can I do," says the worker, "this mother says. "She and another psychologist who doesn't know us file a report. In it they ask for the withdrawal of the guardianship of my children to send them to a residence that does not fit the family. Something that we don't know about," says Marina.

Police at home

"In 2015 with my three children the case is taken to the Community of Madrid. It's all good. Private doctors, private security, everything," explains the parent, who indicates that, "suddenly, on June 30, 2015, my house bell rings. It's the local police. They want me to open the door. They came in from the countryside. They said they had to notify us of something."

So, Marina and Adrián decide to contact the Community of Madrid to see what is happening and they answer that "yes, yes, actually they have gone to notify something, now let's go, they said", details the mother. "In half an hour the technician appears and they declare that the children are in distress and that they (their parents) have to hand them over to a home. A two-year-old boy and two girls, ages 5 and 7," the mother stresses.

"From then on, a terrible harassment on the phone begins. We had to hand over the children ourselves," says Marina, also mentioning that "the law authorizes the public administration to declare a child helpless without going through a judge. Here comes the big problem and the big business. How can it not be dealt with through criminal proceedings? If it were real that I was being tried for it," explains Marina.

"In September, a precautionary measure is requested, all without giving us the file. There the judge decides to hold a hearing. And on November 11, 2015, in that hearing, it is shown that there is no helplessness. All without the file yet. But, without this judge's decision, on November 18 the GRUME (Minors' Group) police come to the house and say 'lady, put the children down or we'll go in by court order'", says the mother.

Garcia did not explain that situation to herself, she did not understand it, and this is something she points out to this newspaper, since according to her statements her case was "by the 79th Family Court and not the 85th where this order came from," she says. "They break into the house, they come in through the window. They force us to sit in the children's playroom. They take the baby out of the crib. My daughters were taken out with towels and wet hair because they were in the shower, as some of the neighbors told me later. And then they throw an '85 paper at us saying to notify the parties. It explains that there are 20 days to appeal, but we are not notified. Besides, the 85 should have inhibited the person who knows the case, which was the 79, which is not done. Therefore, the entry was illegal," argues Marina.

Children are moved from one center to another.

Marina's children are taken to a centre in Madrid. This centre has allegedly been denounced on several occasions. Detailed examples are those reported in the newspapers, such as ABC in its article of 20 February 2020 "Trial reopened against several guards at an orphanage for assaulting four young people years ago" or La Información in its article of 7 November 2016 "Fundación Raíces denounces abuse of minors at the shelter".

"The first time we saw our son he was limping and had yellow skin," says the mother, who, as a result of what she saw, "this is reported in Madrid's Criminal Court 15, which decided to notify the Centre that we had reported it. For this reason, "the children are sent to a centre in Arganda del Rey", although the mother, as she stresses for this newspaper, considers it "a prison with security guards. Children of 2, 5 and 7 years old... A child of 0 to 6 years old cannot enter there. It's horrible," details Marina.

At that time, as Marina explains, "we only had visitors for one hour a week. We would see my son with injuries inside the center in a room of 2x2 meters".

Marina and Adrian decided to take action, but "since we were filming and taking photos, the centre ended up taking away our visits by taking photos and videos of the children inside the place to take them to the criminal courts. They claimed a conflict of interest. Since our children wanted to come with us... they didn't listen to them," explains the mother who says that, shortly afterwards, "they took away our visits and then our calls. We only managed to see our son two and a half years ago, when he told us that his sister was sick and he didn't know about the other one. They refuse to give us proof of life, who they are with...", says Marina. "They have made us psychological and psychiatric reports, which say that we are perfectly fit. No addictions or anything. The Community of Madrid says that it is not valid because it is "on behalf of". They haven't done any studies. The Prosecutor's Office washes its hands of it," this mother declared.

This testimony is one more, like that of so many other parents who are crossing a desert in search of their children, who as they say "have been taken from them".

Institutional child abduction continues, despite pandemic and public complaints

Mila and Dani's baby is kidnapped in Valencia

For some months now, the big media have been echoing a problem that had been heavily censored for decades: the existence of a human trafficking network that corrupts our Child Protection System.

Today, there are nearly 50,000 children under state protection and trapped in a network of shelters, adoptions and disappearances that is fed by billions in public money, supposedly destined for their maintenance, which is divided among a legion of public officials, relatives and subordinates without any kind of control. Through reports that do not need to be contrasted and without the intervention of a judge, our Law grants simple Social Services officials the incomprehensible authority to take away from any family the guardianship of a minor in the name of the State. In this way, the places of care remain always full and their budget is increased every year. Only the deep and widespread corruption of our public authorities can explain the existence of such an abominable phenomenon.

The legalised removal of babies from hospital delivery rooms, which is carried out urgently and without prior warning or justified motivation, is particularly cruel. A new example of this unfortunate and frequent situation is the case of the couple formed by Dani and Mila, two good "normal people", with their virtues and imperfections, who have been destroyed by the abusive kidnapping of their baby.

"Mila" (María del Milagro Varela Lingua) is a dental hygienist and dental student with the soul of an artist, with a pictorial style and embroidery worthy of admiration. Originally from Argentina, she came to Spain at the age of 18, thanks to a change of custody with her emigrant and divorced father. She wanted a change of scenery after needing hospitalization for a mental health problem, which appeared after being a victim of school Builling. She was diagnosed with TLP (borderline personality disorder), a disease that does not limit her intellectual capacity at all and only affects her social capacity in situations of stress or medication mismatches.

She had no problem finding a job on her own in Norway when she turned 20, getting a C-1 degree in that language and saving enough money to return to Valencia and get her degree as a dental hygienist. She worked in Scandinavian camp clinics, first in Malaga, and also in Madrid and Alicante.

Back in his father's house in Valencia, in 2018 he met Dani (Daniel Martín Correa) his great love, of which Salamanca was the cradle, but his parents, artists of paintbrushes, migrated to Elche in search of a land that would allow them to live of creating beauty. The seed did not fall far from the tree, so Dani studied Fine Arts with a specialty in Painting, studied Cello and Double Bass (specialty jazz) at the conservatory. He earns his living as a Fallas sculptor and Jazz musician, having been the Organizer and Producer of the "Jazz en la Serranía" Festival edition I , II and III, with artists of international stature. Paradoxically, he also worked for 8 years as an educator in a centre of MENAS under supervision.

For a few months now, the big media have been echoing a problem that had been heavily censored for decades: the existence of a human trafficking network that corrupts our System of Protection of Minors.

Today, there are nearly 50,000 children under state protection and trapped in a network of shelters, adoptions and disappearances that is fed by billions in public money, supposedly destined for their maintenance, which is divided among a legion of public officials, relatives and subordinates without any kind of control. Through reports that do not need to be contrasted and without the intervention of a judge, our Law grants simple Social Services officials the incomprehensible authority to take away from any family the guardianship of a minor in the name of the State. In this way, the places of care remain always full and their budget is increased every year. Only the deep and widespread corruption of our public authorities can explain the existence of such an abominable phenomenon.

The legalised removal of babies from hospital delivery rooms, which is carried out urgently and without prior warning or justified motivation, is particularly cruel. A new example of this unfortunate and frequent situation is the case of the couple formed by Dani and Mila, two good "normal people", with their virtues and imperfections, who have been destroyed by the abusive kidnapping of their baby.

Mila" (María del Milagro Varela Lingua) is a dental hygienist and dental student with an artist's soul, with a pictorial style and embroidery worthy of admiration. Originally from Argentina, she came to Spain at the age of 18, thanks to a change in custody with her divorced immigrant father. She wanted a change of scenery after needing hospitalization for a mental health problem, which appeared after being a victim of school Builling. She was diagnosed with TLP (borderline personality disorder), a disease that does not limit her intellectual capacity at all and only affects her social capacity in situations of stress or medication mismatches.

She had no problem finding a job on her own in Norway when she turned 20, getting a C-1 degree in that language and saving enough money to return to Valencia and get her degree as a dental hygienist. She worked in Scandinavian camp clinics, first in Malaga, and also in Madrid and Alicante.

Back in his father's house in Valencia, in 2018 he met Dani (Daniel Martín Correa) his great love, of which Salamanca was the cradle, but his parents, artists of paintbrushes, migrated to Elche in search of a land that would allow them to live of creating beauty. The seed did not fall far from the tree, so Dani studied Fine Arts with a specialty in Painting, studied Cello and Double Bass (specialty jazz) at the conservatory. He earns his living as a Fallas sculptor and Jazz musician, having been the Organizer and Producer of the "Jazz en la Serranía" Festival edition I , II and III, with artists of international stature. Paradoxically, he also worked for 8 years as an educator in a centre of MENAS under supervision.

The crush was monumental, because after 3 months of courtship, they decided to move in together. The innate contempt for material values, typical of the artistic spirit that defines them, led them to a house that the bank had seized from a friend of his, until they found a better one.

Neither when Mila was granted her psychic disability nor during her pregnancy had any official warned her that the Administration might consider her a "bad mother" because of her illness. The pregnancy came in June 2019 and already cost her her job by having to leave dental radiology. For her mother's sake and on the advice of her psychiatrist, she stopped taking her medication. This changed her mood and made it difficult for her to live together to the extent that they had to be kept apart during the second trimester. During that time Dani provided her with help, but she, alone and unemployed, became overwhelmed and could not think of a better idea than to ask for help from Social Services. La Casa de La Dona did not grant her help, because they conditioned her to falsely report Dani for Gender-Based Violence and she refused. That's probably when she was marked as a future target for her child hunt.

By the time her due date arrived, they were together again and together they went to the University General Hospital in Valencia to have their child born. Although their first protests about the quality of the care they were receiving could be considered offensive by those health personnel, they must be interpreted as the clash between the symptoms caused by the interruption of Mila's medication and the dehumanization of a health care system that was overcrowded due to the cuts. In no case can they justify the unleashing of a helplessness that, without a doubt, had to be foreseen beforehand.

The baby was born on 11-3-20 in the Maternal Hospital of that hospital, with a cesarean section that was performed without complications. The child was born large and healthy (APGAR 9/10) and there are no traces of drugs or venereals in the mother's or baby's blood. Mila considered it obstetric abuse that after the intervention, the gynecologists did not let her touch her baby, sedated her without her consent, and denied the father access to Neonatos that night. They still did not understand what was happening when, the next day, during the only time she was allowed to see her baby, a pediatrician told her with displeasure that she would not see him again until the Consellería said otherwise. The degree of brutality she perceived in her hospital care was so severe that she claims to have been handcuffed to a wheelchair and tied to a bed to neutralize her protests when she heard that her son was going to be taken away from her.

The apparent cruelty of those health personnel provides an opportunity to express perplexity at the fact that this phenomenon of institutional "kidnapping" of children is only possible thanks to the complicity or passivity of many people in many different positions and places throughout the country. Although it is a multi-million dollar "business", it is clear that this whole army of "involved" people cannot receive money in return, so we must assume other motives such as submission, cowardice or pure evil which, in this case, could reflect the revenge of the humiliation of their pride for the complaints and impertinences of "nervous" patients. The corruption of our institutions may be no more than the reflection of the soul of the people they represent and this may be an indication that we need a collective examination of conscience.

By the time they were given the Resolution of Distress document when they were discharged from Psychiatry, they were still in a state of stupor and thought that it must be some unfortunate misunderstanding that, sooner rather than later, they would manage to solve.

The reading of these documents of helplessness is usually very illustrative and shows the malicious will of the Social Services to falsify the truth, distorting it. In this case, Mr. Jesús Manuel Esquiu González, as Territorial Secretary of the Head of the Childhood, Adolescence and Equality Service of the Autonomous Community of Valencia, signed a document in which, for example, it was stated that the father had not recognised the child before there was material time to process it, as they themselves had refused it at the Hospital and had to process it before the judge in person, just to remove it as an immediate obstacle. It is also alleged that the mother had abandoned psychiatric medication, but it is omitted that this was necessary because of the pregnancy, thus discriminating against her on the basis of her disability. The degree of cynicism is even reached when, in the same paragraph, it is stated that there is "suspicion of gender violence" and that "she rejects the resources proposed to improve her social and health situation", after they themselves had been denied because what she rejected was falsely denouncing Dani.

But what seems more serious to us in this document, which could make it a crime, are 2 of the motivations it alleges: The mother's handicap recognized by the State due to her mental health problem and the lack of "stable housing resources". Article 17 of the Organic Law on the Legal Protection of Minors states: "The concurrence of circumstances or material deficiencies shall be considered an indicator of risk, but may never lead to the separation of the family environment. And in point 2 of article 18 it reads: "The situation of poverty of the parents, guardians or custodians may not be taken into account for the assessment of the situation of helplessness. Likewise, in no case shall a child be separated from his or her parents on the grounds of a disability of the child, of both parents or of one of them".

Their arguments, pleas and protests were of no use. In the end, the Valencia Regional Government gave the baby to a foster family. They did so in the midst of alarm over the coronavirus, however, now justifying their state of alarm by not allowing Dani and Mila to see the baby at a meeting point.

After this time, technicians such as Carmen Aguilar or Reme Garrido (Vice President and Minister of Equality and Inclusive Policies), members of the Psychosocial Teams of the Valencia City Council and the Regional Ministry in charge of the case, have already had the opportunity to verify that many of the inconsistent motivations on which the abandonment was based have been corrected: Dani registered and recognized the baby, Mila resumed her psychiatric medication, both have proven to be a cohesive couple and have located "legal" and affordable housing where they can move. They were informed that a meeting would be held at the Consellería last Thursday, April 23, 2010, in which they were assured that the abandonment would be reconsidered with the intention of returning their child to them urgently. But their expectations were frustrated, because new demands and a new longer term have been imposed on them.

The experience that we have accumulated in this editorial office from the many cases of abusive abandonment that we have been publishing for almost 5 years, allows us to identify this dilatory strategy as a typical pattern of action of the Social Services and to point it out as "distracting manoeuvres" to outwit the parents and to waste their savings and energy in trying to refute all the reproaches that come to their minds in each "assessment meeting". This pattern is repeated in exactly the same way in all the Autonomous Communities (despite the fact that powers are transferred to each of them independently), giving rise to the idea that it is an "organized business", run in a centralized way.

In our country, the defenselessness of the parents who are victims of this horror before the powers of the State is absolute. The Political Powers (Executive and Legislative are not divided in practice) are the ones who promote and cover up this plot. An example of this is the veto imposed by the parties of the current Government Coalition (PSOE and Podemos) for the creation of a commission of investigation on the network of massive prostitution of minors under guardianship in Mallorca and many other points of the National Geography, both in the National Parliament and in the Balearic and Valencian Autonomous Communities.

Claims before a judiciary that is incapable of dealing with political interventionism often come up against their cowardly abstention, against the delaying of the eternal waiting lists for judicial appointments, against a corporatism imposed by law that obliges them to abide by the expertise of the same technicians who steal the children and, sometimes, against the complicity of some members of the judiciary who participate, directly or indirectly, in the profits of this business.

In recent months, the Fourth Estate (Press) has finally begun to reject the pressure of censorship on all issues related to minors. Even programs of the Spanish Public Television (Vg.: Comando Actualidad de TVE1) are taking the risk to denounce these terrible abuses, but, far from getting them to stop, they have not managed to prevent them from increasing in number and cruelty.

We are trying to recruit international help, both media and diplomatic, to try to dismantle this industry of horror. But from this writing we understand that this battle must be led and driven by the parents of these abducted children. That is why we encourage the parents concerned to organise and coordinate so that they can present a more forceful response to the State Administration, in order to stop this horror and force them to return their children.

IN SPAIN THE RIGHTS OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES ARE BEING VIOLATED WITH SERIOUS CHILD ABUSE BY SPANISH INSTITUTIONS

Dr Juan Mariano Pérez Abad, is a Spanish surgeon and child and family rights activist. Dr Juan Mariano lives in Murcia, an autonomous community in southeast Spain. This activist is publicly claiming and denouncing the serious abuse against children by the institutions of the Spanish State, because they need a lot of media and diplomatic pressure to be able to solve it. It is about the many cases in which the Social Services take many children from their families without justified reasons, to take them to homes or foster families paid by the State. In Spain, nearly 50,000 children (one in every 150) are under the guardianship of the State. For the Social Services, it is easy to take them away from their families, because the intervention of a judge is not necessary. Spanish law allows its officials to make this radical decision themselves. Some people might wonder what reason there might be for such an outrage. Of course, the reason is money. Spain spends the incredible amount of between 6 and 9,000 euros per month for the maintenance of each of these children. The excessively compassionate European social policies have meant that charity has become a real BUSINESS here that takes on a life of its own and needs RAW MATERIAL to function. However, in spite of so much economic effort, the educational results are catastrophic: Campaigns are organized to collect clothes and food for the children in care as if, in spite of so much expense, they were in need; The centres are overcrowded and lack the necessary personnel, to the point that the use of sedative drugs and physical punishment to maintain discipline is justified. With all this, the rate of school failure among them exceeds 90%. They are uprooted by preventing them from contact with their biological families and are turned against them, so that when they come of age, they are often thrown out on the streets without family, resources or education to fall directly into crime and prostitution. Last year, 1,521 minors under guardianship disappeared in Spain. Recently, several child prostitution networks have been uncovered, with the consent of the responsible officials, in several parts of the country. The largest of these appeared on the island of Mallorca, but both the regional and national parliaments have refused to investigate the matter in order to establish responsibility. All official economic data on minors are hidden by the Spanish Administration. If we calculate an average of 7,000 euros per month per child, we can estimate an annual expenditure of 4,200 million euros per year in this chapter alone. A large part of this money is invested through subsidized companies that manage the homes and residences where they are housed. A whole legion of civil servants, technicians, educators and social workers live at the expense of this enormous public investment and the profits of these companies lack the necessary control to prevent them from benefiting the authorities responsible for controlling all this. The administrative and judicial corruption, as well as the censorship that controls the media, allows such monstrosity to be maintained in this country of mafias DISguised as Democracy. And it is precisely the need for this disguise that is the weak point of this corrupt system. That is why we think that making it known to the whole world is the best way to fight it. Recently, there have been new abductions of children, this time from citizens of Miami and Cordoba in Argentina.

Collectives against the 'Gypsy Secretariat' subsidized by Irene Montero: "That the name is removed, does not represent us

THEIR PRESIDENT PEDRO PUENTE DEFINES HIMSELF IN HIS PROFILE AS "A GYPSY OF THE SOUL AND OF ADOPTION", SOMETHING THAT IS NOT TOLERATED BY THIS GROUP THAT CONSIDERS HIM "A GADGET"

Emilio Kali, leader of Kali Yag, an association that fights for the rights of the Roma culture, and José Maldonado, president of the National Association of Roma Children, show their discontent with the Foundation of the Rome Secretariat (FSG) because there is not a single Roma on the board. They thus join the struggle led by Patriarch Juan Cortés, who called for the Foundation to be chaired by a "non-clown" person. The FSG has just received almost 900,000 euros from Irene Montero's Ministry. The Minister of Health, Salvador Illa, stated that this Monday, April 13, Spain had reached the peak of the COVID-19 coronavirus curve, so cases of contagion will decrease since then. But just a few days earlier, when the pandemic hit the country hardest, the Ministry of Equality, led by Irene Montero, issued a ministerial order, published in the Official State Bulletin on April 1, which granted the amount of 839,268 euros to the Fundación Secretariado Gitano (Archive 201903PA001), for "assistance and guidance to victims of discrimination on the basis of racial or ethnic origin" . This caused many Roma groups to exploit and, from the very beginning, oppose a public subsidy of almost one million dollars granted by the minister and the wife of Pablo Iglesias in the midst of the coronavirus crisis. From that very moment, many groups of this ethnic group pointed out to the Foundation of the Romani Secretariat (FSG) "for not having any Roma in their leadership positions of president, general director and honorary president". Uncle Juan, Juan Cortés, grandfather of Mariluz, the girl murdered by Santiago del Valle in 2008, is one of the leaders of this movement who claims that the Roma people have nothing to do with this Foundation. In statements to elcierredigital.com, which his "cousins" call Tio Juan, they point out that "we do not represent the Fundación Secretariado Gitano at all, we are not a secretariat, we are a people, if we are whole, Minister Montero as well as Queen Letizia". Something that they wanted to emphasize once again by saying "that the name of the Foundation should be removed from that of gypsy, so that it does not represent us". On the website gitanos.org, it is specified that the president of the FSG is Pedro Puente is of Leonese origin, "gypsy of the soul" and "gypsy of adoption", as he himself defined. He is "a gypsy priest of the Catholic Church", a definition that coincides with that of several gypsy associations, as they have pointed out for elcierredigital.com. The complaints of many groups fall on his shoulders, as president of the Fundación Secretariado Gitano. He was the founding member and driving force from its origins more than thirty years ago "and never got off the wagon," they say. A week ago, Juan Cortés told elcierredigital.com that "please remove the name gitano. It doesn't represent us. Since he will be an adopted gypsy or a gypsy of the soul. A gypsy is a gypsy and a clown is a clown. Kali The Yag Association opposes FSG Many Roma groups and associations do not agree with the work done by the Rome Secretariat and "Kali Yag", an association that fights for the rights of Roma culture, have also shown their rejection of the Foundation. The leader of the association, Emilio Kali, points out that "the fact that the Foundation is not governed by Romany staff already defines it as a total incongruity." They have established themselves in power and are no longer coming down. Pedro Puente has been there for many years. He's been decorated several times and they're very strong. There are gypsies on the board, but there are none on the board. They tell you they are working with many gypsies, but nothing at all. Every tenth "gypsies" there is a gypsy. That's the rule," explains Emilio Kali for elcierredigital.com. The Fundación del Secretariado Gitano has received millions of euros in grants in recent years. A clear example is shown in this document accessed by elcierredigital.com, where you can see how the Department of Equality and Inclusive Policies of the Generalitat Valenciana sends two packages of subsidies to each center that the Foundation has in the Community. The first, estimated at 116,815.00 euros in 2019 and the second, of 272,385.25 euros in 2020. It is part of the so-called Kumpaña Project, which, as Emilio Kali indicates, "is a large amount of subsidy money to provide school support to only 25 people. children. This is bullshit. That's how it is in Valencia and elsewhere. They are hurting us gypsies," he says. "We've tried to talk to them. But we feel that there is a kind of syndrome, so to speak, that would be that 'the white man has to save us gypsies, but he always saves us in his own way. It's a bit of an ugly struggle, to say the least," says the leader of "Kali Yag". With regard to the alleged work offered by the FSG to the Gypsies, Emilio Kali concludes that "where they want us to integrate. To be helped to look for work in the market is a bargain. I download an application to look for a job". And that's all, but the problem is that they have that program. A specific team of technicians for the projects. There's no way anyone can say no to them. Then the result has to be seen," he says. The National Association of Gypsy Children, against It was José Maldonado, president of the Association for the Protection of Gypsy Children, who was one of the first to raise his voice against the Foundation of the Secretariat of Gypsies (FSG). In an August 2019 video, Maldonado complained that "a non-profit association like this has 70 premises bought on a property". A few months later, he wanted to express his concern about this issue on elcierredigital.com: "A few years ago, the National Confederation of Gypsies requested the creation of a national association that should be entirely Gypsy and the president should be a Gypsy, not a clown," Maldonado told our newspaper. As this was not carried out at the time, Maldonado explains, "the president of the Gypsy Secretariat, Mr. Puente, filed a judicial complaint in which it was said that there was a threat. It was then that he took the opportunity to change the name of the Asociación Secretariado Gitano to the Fundación del Secretariado Gitano ". "This gentleman is a priest and represents the Catholic Church in a very legal way, but he does not represent the Gypsies. There was a meeting at the Gypsy Democratic Assembly in Madrid and we presented our proposals. In these proposals, one of them was that a legal complaint would be filed against the Foundation so that it would not use the word gypsy. As there are none in their general management positions," said the president of the Association for the Protection of Gypsy Children. This man, Pedro Puente, is in contact with the European Community on the issue of subsidies. It is a network that has been established in such a big way that it has 70 delegations in Spain with headquarters in Madrid ", comments Maldonado and adds that " it is a Foundation created at a European level, since in Romania it is also in charge of the FSG Problem. It is a giant, where in the delegations there are no gypsies. In his Foundation there is not a single gypsy", he points out. The Roma patriarch, José Maldonado, in charge of the protection of Roma minors, is also concerned about the issue of minors under guardianship, so he says that "by granting subsidies worth millions to the FSG, this government has not cared about the 50,000 children in the minors' centres. And the Foundation does not care for these children at all. They say that this is not their task. What is it then, what do they do with these millionaire subsidies, where is the money? invested, because the gypsy groups do not see it". This government has not taken care of the 50,000 children in the children's centres. And the Foundation does not care for these children at all. They say that this is not their task. What is it, then, that they do with these millionaire subsidies, where is the money invested, because the gypsy groups do not see it ". This government has not taken care of the 50,000 children in the children's centres. And the Foundation doesn't take care of these children at all. They say that this is not their task. What is it, then, that they do with these millionaire subsidies, where is the money invested, because the gypsy groups do not see it "

My five-year-old boy was stolen with false, manipulated and misrepresented reports," says this mother

Laura Allongo's journey: She's been trying to get her son back, which she hasn't seen for six years

The child arrived in Spain in an irregular manner because there was no other way for him to enter the country, because he was very sick. Laura took care of the child and kept him for three years when everything was going well, but then Social Services kept him for a time after giving him up for adoption to a family.

Laura Allongo, from Llanera, Asturias, is a mother who shows elcierredigital.com her concern and desperation after the child she took care of was passed on to Social Affairs and later given to another family. Her case begins with a Nigerian boy who arrives in Spain due to his illness. Laura was able to take care of him because he was her partner's nephew. But, this hell for them begins when "we turn to social workers for help and to pay for the day care," explains Laura

"We had it for three perfect years," explains Laura, who tells of her bad experience from the beginning: "the lawyer tells me that they're not going to take my son away from us," so they start with "a normal process and a paper trail. Up to three times Social Affairs came to visit us with a psychologist," says Laura. "When he was three years old the file had to be changed or that's what they wanted. I refused to hand it in and one day it was stolen from my school," says this mother.

Laura sees the true face of the Administration and begins to see a calvary "where she suffers from a lack of judicial protection and the only person in the whole process who defended the interests of the child, who was the prosecutor who was handling the case, was removed from the prosecution. The violation of rights, both hers and the child's, who suffers the terrible injustice of this administration monster," says Laura.

"It's six years of immense pain because I see that the best interests of the child do not exist. The only thing that exists for the Asturian administration is the best interest of money, causing irreparable damage to my son, breaking all his attachments, making him insecure for life," explains this mother.

A desert to get her son back

Families in this situation live in a complete drama, so they sometimes resort to drastic measures to recover their children in any way. "Four mothers went on a hunger strike in front of the State Attorney General's office. I lost in all instances. During these six years I did not have effective judicial protection and I was involved in a file with false, manipulated, distorted and occult reports, denounced in the General State Prosecutor's Office and in the Superior Prosecutor's Office of Asturias with evidence. My son was never helpless. The Administration itself recognized that the good care I gave to the child made him a candidate for adoption, explains Laura.

"The professionals of the Administration are not registered. They don't sign with a registered number. They sign with the registration number. I reported it to the Public Prosecutor's Office, but they gave me an answer that made me forget it," says the mother.

"From the time they took my son away from me, we had visitors until the trial took place. They were pitiful, only serving to break the bond with the family. That's torture. The visits were not recorded and were monitored. A blank piece of paper had to be signed to indicate that we had attended, so I took a notary to one of them to show him how it was done," this woman told this newspaper.

"I can't talk to him. They opened a preadoccupation file on him and took it away from me when he was only five years old. People want babies, and if I don't fight for him, he'll be in a juvenile facility right now," Laura says.

A lot of money for children in care

"All we ask, mothers who are in a situation like me, is that a judge with a fair trial act. The children are harmed for economic interests by breaking their childhood, since they grow up without attachment in centres when they should be with their families," says Laura, who even goes so far as to say that "for each child, Social Affairs receives 68,000 euros a year from the European Union through the ERDF funds, more than 4,000 to 9,000 euros a month.

"I am going to dedicate my life to defending all the violations my son suffers, I want him to know the truth. I have a lot of respect for the family that has him, but my son's right takes precedence over everything else," admits Laura, who will continue to fight to get her son back to the happy times when she lived with him before this painful journey.

THE PANDEMIC LEAVES THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN IN CARE IN SPAIN IN OBLIVION

In Spain, there are thousands of children under State guardianship in shelters, whose guardianship has been withdrawn from their parents by the public administration with false, manipulated, distorted and hidden reports, without a court order, without a trial, and without the right to be heard or to defend themselves, thus violating the rights of children and the family. In these last 15 days children are living the confinement due to the coronavirus pandemic, which is a period of special complexity. Although at first, according to the government, they are not a group at special risk of infection by the coronavirus, but they are forced to remain confined and deprived of their visits in application of the security norms imposed by the state of alarm. In return, the Department of Equality and Social Policies has not agreed to any right to telephone calls or the assessment of other means such as video conferences, or any other in this sense". There are many cases in which children are in confinement, without communication with the family, this is a full-blown kidnapping, escaping the coronavirus.

According to workers at the centers, they are having a very hard time because even though they try to have their routine and do their homework, there are no technological means for everyone, so online education is uphill for them. There is also no educational reinforcement, and the presence of volunteers is not authorized. Workers must keep a safe distance, but it is very complicated because the children miss their families. Isolation is causing children to have anxiety crises, cry desperately and want to go out on the streets or have visitors because they do not understand why they have to be locked up and not see their family.

Educators in some centres have reported a lack of individual protection materials despite the fact that staff come and go daily, and they demand that they be tested to see if they are affected by the virus and that they be provided with masks to protect the children and employees from infection. There are children with symptoms and possible coronavirus who are not tested and workers with symptoms who continue to work due to lack of staff. There are also children with diabetes or strong treatment who may be vulnerable if they get the coronavirus, but no one pays attention, the central government does not mention the children in care. From the administrations they know that the supply of food has dropped and the children remain hungry, however on 29 March 2020 only their families and some educators are worried about the children, who are now much better off at home with their families and not in the situation of helplessness they are currently in the shelters. The courts are closed, the public prosecutor's office does not act either, and in Spain there are many people who are grateful to the health services, but the memory of the children in care is forgotten because nobody cares, what are they waiting for? for the same thing to happen as has happened to the elderly in the homes? A mother committed suicide four days ago because of this situation and only her family cared, the families and people who are fighting for this situation, and the worst thing of all is that neither the radio stations nor the televisions nor the Spanish newspapers give them any importance, because they are media bought by the government. Their children will always be reminded that the social services forcibly removed them from the family womb, causing them irreparable damage and, worst of all, the loss of a mother who could not cope with the fight against the social services for lack of justice. A death that should not be contested.

LA ASOCIACIÓN NACIONAL DEL MENOR GITANO A SOLICITADO URGENTEMENTE POR ESCRITO AL REY Y AL PRESIDENTE DEL GOBIERNO LA INTERVENCIÓN DEL EJÉRCITO DE ESPAÑA PARA AYUDAR A LOS NIÑOS QUE ESTÁN EN LOS CENTROS DE ACOGIDA EN ESTA GRAVE SITUACIÓN DE PANDEMIA

José Maldonado Sandoval, Presidente de la Asociación Nacional del Menor Gitano se dirige a Su Majestad el Rey de España, Don Felipe VI y Jefe de las Fuerzas Armadas Españolas y a Don Pedro Sánchez Pérez-Castejón, Presidente del Gobierno Español para solicitar con motivo del Estado de Alarma que vivimos en la actualidad, de igual manera que el Ejército Español ha entrado en Residencias de Ancianos para protegerlos de la pandemia que vivimos actualmente y se ha encontrando con una situación dantesca de ancianos muertos, ORDENEN la entrada URGENTE del Ejército Español en Centros de Menores de España para protegerlos de la pandemia en esta grave situación de pandemia, y que los niños sean entregados a sus familias para su protección al mismo tiempo que se informe a las familias de los que sucede con sus hijos en esta grave situación de pandemia y que podrían quedar abandonados a su suerte como ya tenemos noticias ha sucedido con los ancianos.

LA ASOCIACIÓN NACIONAL DEL MENOR GITANO HAS URGENTLY REQUESTED BY EMAIL TO THE KING OF SPAIN AND THE PRESIDENT OF THE GOVERNMENT THE INTERVENTION OF THE ARMY OF SPAIN TO HELP THE CHILDREN WHO ARE IN THE SHELTERS IN THIS SERIOUS SITUATION OF PANDEMIC

José Maldonado Sandoval, President of the Asociación Nacional del Menor Gitano, writes to His Majesty the King of Spain, Mr. Felipe VI and Chief of the Spanish Armed Forces and Mr. Pedro Sánchez Pérez-Castejón, President of the Spanish Government to request, on the occasion of the State of Alarm that we are experiencing at present, in the same way that the Spanish Army has entered into old People's Homes to protect them from the pandemic that we are currently experiencing and have found ourselves with a dantesque situation of dead old people, ORDER the URGENT entry of the Spanish Army into Children's Centers in Spain to protect them from the pandemic in this serious pandemic situation, and that the children be given to their families for their protection at the same time that the families are informed of what is happening to their children in this serious pandemic situation and that they could be abandoned to their fate as we have already heard from the old people.

The "BAG MAN" is an official of the Spanish State.

Spain is a country where it has always been very easy for a family to lose their children.

It is not that of women, nor that of transsexuals, nor that of immigrants. Undoubtedly, the most defenseless, vulnerable and sensitive group, but at the same time most important for the future and survival of a Society, is that of childhood. Their care and education is a fundamental strategic chapter for the survival of a State over time. For this reason, the perversions that the Spanish Political Class has lavished on this matter in recent decades could be described as HIGH-BETRAYAL.

Spain is a country where it has always been very easy for a family to lose their children. The fear of losing them is so great that a legendary fictional character named "the Man with the Sack" was generated who entered the houses and took the children. But in this article we are not going to talk to you about the more than 2,000 DISAPPEARANCES of minors that are reported each year (1,500 escapes and disappearances of children protected by the State in shelters, during the past year 2,019) or the 2,750 children who they are still missing today. On this matter we just want to highlight the strangeness that the mainstream media, from time to time, select one of these cases to make it a top-rated media show. It seems as if, doing so much deployment in a few cases and completely ignoring the others, his intention was to generate the false impression that there are very few.

What we are actually going to talk about is those children who are taken from their legitimate families by direct action or with the complicity of the Spanish State itself, which allow us to affirm that "the Man with the Sack is an official of the Spanish State".

Throughout the contemporary history of this country, 3 ways of presenting this phenomenon are identified:

CHILDREN STOLEN BY FRANCOISM, are about 30,000 children who were mentored by the Franco Regime during the immediate postwar period, because their parents had died or because they were imprisoned for belonging to the Republican side. To these were added those from the large operation for the repatriation of minors ordered by Franco, from whom they had been evacuated by their parents during the war (especially those sent to the Soviet Union) for whose recovery (or kidnapping, according to versions) clandestine operations were organized in foreign territory. But it was not until 2008, that the well-known judge Baltasar Garzón (later disqualified) changed the consideration of that operation of the Franco Regime to that of "not prescribed crime of illegal detention, with forced disappearance of people and abduction of minors from their parents ”Declaring it a crime against Humanity and urging the persecution and conviction of those responsible who, by the way, had already died in their entirety.

Around the decade of the 80s, already in the midst of Democracy, the phenomenon of STOLEN CHILDREN IN MATERNITY CLINICS developed. The phenomenon was widespread throughout the country, but the most famous case has been that of Dr. Eduardo Vela and Sister María Florencia Gómez Valbuena, gynecologist and religious of the order of the Daughters of Charity of Saint Vincent Paul respectively. The collusion of public entities with the accused was always evident. For more than 15 years, Sor María had been accused on several occasions for the same crime, but it was not until early 2012 when a date was set for a trial that was not held, due to a death certificate that declared her deceased. Although many suspicions were raised when it was revealed that this certificate contained documentary falsehoods, it is very demonstrative that it was not even ordered to check if there was any corpse inside his grave. However, it was even more outrageous than the sentence that convicted Dr. Vela in October 2018, but acquitted him because his crime had prescribed. The associations of affected people such as add, number between 200,000 and 300,000 children stolen by this mechanism in the second half of the 20th century in Spain. I mean

Since then, and with the slightest suspicion, the increased availability of DNA tests for paternity tests easily exposed this type of child abduction, and its frequency was drastically reduced. But the abductions did not stop, because his disappearance gave way to a new form of "child theft" that could be carried out within the current legislation.

The Organic Law for the Legal Protection of Minors in 1996 greatly facilitated the legal removal of children from their parents by declaring the child in distress, the withdrawal of guardianship of the biological family and its attribution to Social Services on behalf of the State. The procedure was simplified, which is now carried out through a simple administrative resolution, issued by an official without judicial intervention.

This initiative was almost simultaneous throughout the European Union and was accompanied by a huge economic endowment, typical of the compassionate policies of rich countries that sought to present themselves as "socially advanced". From there, the declarations of helplessness multiplied exponentially. A large number of companies that operated under the format of foundations and NGOs, arranged their services with the Administration to attend to the care and education of that enormous number of children. Thus, a great business emerged in which only the chosen ones had the option for their “host companies” to get a slice of that cake.

If we assess the catastrophic results obtained with these children by the State, in terms of academic levels and social-labor integration upon reaching the age of majority (both in public and concerted centers) we can affirm that it has been a millionaire business for some, but a public money very badly used for the desired objective (to protect and educate) of which, curiously, the State has never bothered to ask for accounts.

Disguising the right to privacy and honor of the minor, that State Law also dealt with censoring all information about minors. This obscurantism reached its maximum expression in Spain after the prostitution case of foreign conservators (now called MENAS) at the Bar Arnie in Seville. After the emblematic case of the "Girls of Alcasser", this once again filled the front pages of the newspapers, but this time the lists full of names and surnames of famous and powerful people accused in those pedophile affairs were reflected. The cancellation of all the testimonies of the prostituted minors led to the collective acquittal of the accused, except for the Marqués de Sotohermoso (who pleaded guilty on his own initiative and still did not step in jail) and those of the owner and manager of the premises.

Since then, all the information on the frequent cases of sexual perversion with minors in custody have been censored and blocked, as well as the journalists who dared to disclose them have been discredited and persecuted. The cases of the television presenter Pepe Navarro (from “We crossed the Mississippi”) for the “Case Alcaser” or the journalist Josele Sánchez (The Tribune of Spain) for the one of “Bar Spain” serve as an example.

Because among those cases, it is worth noting the CASO BAR ESPAÑA, with more than 80 supervised children victims of rape and at least 6 infanticides, which involves such important figures in contemporary Spanish politics as a President of the Deputation of Castellón (Fabra) a President of the Valencian Autonomous Community (Camps) or a President of the Milan Soccer Club (Giuseppe Farina) and who has never been seriously investigated.

Only now, after years of work by many independent activists to overcome the information blockade, the mainstream media have wanted to echo one of those issues that have been occurring throughout this time, such as the massive prostitution of women. teenagers supervised by the State in places like Mallorca or La Rioja.

The phenomenon of child abduction, whether stolen or protected, always had a major impact on the poorest and most discriminated social strata, which in turn are the ones that maintain the highest reproductive rates. In the post-war era, there were many children because of the “Baby-boom”, so child trafficking represented a problem of violation of Human Rights at the individual level. However, when the current stage of the “Guardianships” began, we were already in the middle of the “Era of Well-being” and the collapse of the birth rate had already become a state problem. That change from “stealing” them to “guardianship” represented a notable increase in the total number of children abducted in the poorest social strata, therefore, the level of harassment of the “quarries” of birth in our country.

http://vegamediapress.com/art/19205/el-hombre-del-saco-es-funcionario-del-estado-espanol

by Juan Mariano Perez Abad